This website uses cookies: By continuing to browse this site you accept its Privacy Policy and Cookies.

I accept cookies

I refuse cookies

logo

News Detail

Home/Scottish government urged to reconsider ban on gene editing
scottish-government

Scottish government urged to reconsider ban on gene editing

The Scottish Government has long been opposed to the cultivation of GMO, saying they threaten the ‘clean, green status of Scotland’s £15 billion food and drink sector’

SNP and Green ministers have been accused of putting their ‘constitutional obsession’ ahead of Scotland’s food security.

The attack on the Scottish Government comes as ministers south of the border are set to table legislation tomorrow which would allow farmers to plant crops that have been edited to be more resistant to disease or need less water or fertiliser.

While the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill was first touted in the wake of Brexit, the UK Government is speeding up the process over fears about the impact of Russian blockades preventing the export of wheat from Ukraine.

World wheat prices have jumped 25 per cent in the past six weeks and there are fears over food security.

Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England gave MPs an ‘apocalyptic’ warning last week, saying that it was a ‘major, major worry’ for the UK and the developing world.

The use of gene editing or ‘precision technology’ in the UK was initially stopped by a 2018 ruling from the European Court of Justice which determined it should be regulated in the same way as genetically modified organisms (GMO).

The Scottish Government has long been opposed to the cultivation of GMO, saying they threaten the ‘clean, green status of Scotland’s £15 billion food and drink sector.’

Their policy is ‘to stay aligned with the EU, where practicable’.

However, NFU Scotland said there was a significant distinction between genetic modification and gene editing which the Scottish Government needed to recognise.

Genetic modification involves putting genes in, sometimes from a completely different species.

NFU Scotland President Martin Kennedy said: Scottish farmers and crofters, backed by some world-leading research facilities here in Scotland, have always shown themselves to be early adopters of new farming technologies.

He said: NFU Scotland believes precision breeding techniques such as gene editing have considerable potential to deliver benefits for food, agriculture and climate change to build on the significant amount of work that farmers and crofters are already undertaking to establish more sustainable and resilient farming systems.

New technologies, including the likes of gene editing can help address positively some of the big challenges Scottish agriculture faces, including how we respond to the climate emergency and address biodiversity loss, he said.

Scottish Conservative Shadow Rural Affairs Secretary Rachael Hamilton said the government risked leaving Scottish farmers behind.

She said: The SNP-Green Government’s continued refusal to alter their stance on gene editing flies in the face of expert opinion. They are putting their constitutional obsession above the interests of our farming industry.

I have met with the Roslin Institute, the NFUS, the James Hutton Institute and other experts who could not be clearer about the benefits of gene editing, she said.

She said: SNP-Green Ministers are now going to leave our farmers behind at a time when they need our full support. Scottish farmers are going to be looking on enviously to their colleagues south of the border with this legislation coming into force.

A Scottish Government spokesperson said: Scotland’s policy on GMOs has not changed. We remain opposed to the use of GM in farming, to protect the clean, green brand of Scotland’s £15 billion food and drink industry.

We are aware of current debate around new genomic techniques and how these relate to existing GM legislation, and we note in particular the ongoing consideration of this at EU level. The Scottish Government’s policy is to stay aligned with the EU, where practicable, and we are closely monitoring the EU’s position on this issue.